<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On This Day in UB History: May 17 (Slavery and Alcohol)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ubcentral.org/2017/05/17/on-this-day-in-ub-history-may-17-slavery-and-alcohol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ubcentral.org/2017/05/17/on-this-day-in-ub-history-may-17-slavery-and-alcohol/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-this-day-in-ub-history-may-17-slavery-and-alcohol</link>
	<description>News From The United Brethren in Christ Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Becky Kendall		</title>
		<link>https://ubcentral.org/2017/05/17/on-this-day-in-ub-history-may-17-slavery-and-alcohol/comment-page-1/#comment-65363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becky Kendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubcentral.org/?p=24404#comment-65363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Knowing that we claim Francis Scott Key as United Brethren, and seeing that news sites today state he personally owned slaves, I&#039;ve been perplexed.  Wikipedia says:

&quot;The United Brethren took a strong stand against slavery, beginning around 1820. After 1837, slave owners were no longer allowed to remain as members of the United Brethren Church.&quot;

If that is correct, it would explain how Key could be UB and a slaveholder.  But were we really &quot;firmly abolitionist&quot; from the beginning, or were we firmly abolitionist from about 1820 onward?

And has anyone addressed this &quot;Key&quot; contradiction in writing?

Becky Kendall
Huntington, IN
(attending College Park UB)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing that we claim Francis Scott Key as United Brethren, and seeing that news sites today state he personally owned slaves, I&#8217;ve been perplexed.  Wikipedia says:</p>
<p>&#8220;The United Brethren took a strong stand against slavery, beginning around 1820. After 1837, slave owners were no longer allowed to remain as members of the United Brethren Church.&#8221;</p>
<p>If that is correct, it would explain how Key could be UB and a slaveholder.  But were we really &#8220;firmly abolitionist&#8221; from the beginning, or were we firmly abolitionist from about 1820 onward?</p>
<p>And has anyone addressed this &#8220;Key&#8221; contradiction in writing?</p>
<p>Becky Kendall<br />
Huntington, IN<br />
(attending College Park UB)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
